After this review of the responses, one has to ask oneself: Was the same event really being reported? Did young people from all over the world meet in Lausanne to discuss and define the next steps and the goals of their movement? Thunberg play in this? Is this movement going from success to success without precedent, or was there quarrelling, tears and disagreement? Why is the column in the "Weltwoche" the only valid summary? Why is only the NZZ able to primarily report and not comment?
This is not funny, but rather frightening. It is myanmar rcs data frightening because it is not only the major New York Times that is changing a Trump headline because its readers found it to be correct in content but too Trump-friendly. It is not only the major German weekly Die Zeit that is backtracking and apologizing after daring to question the usefulness of the rescue operations in the Mediterranean.
But because in Switzerland too, the media are increasingly serving their clientele and telling them what they want to hear. Discussion, debate, a factual report on the youth climate summit, then the commentary of an enthusiastic supporter, the commentary of a reserved doubter, and then "form your own opinion", as the German tabloid "Bild" so beautifully advertises?