Is there any way to tell when longer snippets >300 characters are still used? Some SEOs have hypothesized a connection between longer snippets at the top of the page and featured snippets. In our overall dataset, 13.3% of SERPs had snippets. If we look only at SERPs where the display snippet length was up to 160 characters i.e. results that were 160 characters or less, the incidence of featured snippets was 11.4%. If we look at SERPs where at least one display snippet was longer than 300 characters, the incidence of featured snippets was 41.8%. While the second dataset is fairly small, it is a significant distinction. There does seem to be some connection between Google’s ability to pull answers in the form of featured snippets and its ability or willingness to display longer search snippets. However, in many cases these longer snippets are rewritten or pulled directly from the page, so even then there is no guarantee that Google will use your longer meta description.
If you’ve already increased your meta descriptions a bit, I don’t see egypt mobile database any reason to panic. It might make sense to rewrite overly long descriptions on key pages, especially if truncation leads to undesirable results. If you do choose to rewrite some of them, consider the 150150 approach – at least that way you’ll be more future-proof.
How to Diagnose and Fix JavaScript SEO Problems in 6 Steps
It is quite common for companies to build websites using modern JavaScript frameworks and libraries such as React, Angular or Vue. It is obvious that the current web has moved away from pure HTML and entered the JS era.
While there’s nothing unusual about businesses’ willingness to take advantage of the latest technologies, we need to address a stark reality about this trend: most migrations to JavaScript frameworks aren’t made with users or organic traffic in mind.