Publicly admitting mistakes of
Posted: Sun Feb 02, 2025 4:01 am
The Chancellor apparently finally realized that her decision was a mistake and could not be implemented. Whether she was well advised or acted on her own initiative remains to be seen. In the face of this obvious mistake, the Chancellor chose to criticize herself, took full responsibility for the mistake and apologized effectively. The tension was written all over her face when she said: "This mistake is my mistake alone, because in the end I bear the ultimate responsibility."
Mea culpa convinced me. Such words had never asia rcs data been heard from the Chancellor before. In any case, she managed to free herself from the pressure of the media. The act of remorse was cleverly calculated, it distracted from the vaccination chaos and the corruption scandals. One journalist described Merkel's apology as a "spoken diamond", although the Chancellor is rarely self-critical.
More and more politicians and leaders are asking for forgiveness or an apology, knowing full well that those who take the blame cannot be burdened with additional guilt. Even Archbishop Woelki chose the path of public contrition in the abuse scandal. Lawyers usually warn against mea culpa. It is dangerous, because it could be a legally relevant admission of guilt with corresponding consequences.
Mea culpa convinced me. Such words had never asia rcs data been heard from the Chancellor before. In any case, she managed to free herself from the pressure of the media. The act of remorse was cleverly calculated, it distracted from the vaccination chaos and the corruption scandals. One journalist described Merkel's apology as a "spoken diamond", although the Chancellor is rarely self-critical.
More and more politicians and leaders are asking for forgiveness or an apology, knowing full well that those who take the blame cannot be burdened with additional guilt. Even Archbishop Woelki chose the path of public contrition in the abuse scandal. Lawyers usually warn against mea culpa. It is dangerous, because it could be a legally relevant admission of guilt with corresponding consequences.