Korea Database

The paper is not a finished concept and does not intend to be one. It contains many points and suggestions that are worth discussing. Because one should and can certainly argue about whether a suggestion that has been frequently mentioned in recent weeks as evidence and example of presumptuous passages in this paper, such as the one that the ARD should refer to private broadcasters as "media capitalist locusts" - is actually a helpful and practical suggestion. But everyone who reports qatar rcs data on the ARD paper and the suggestions it contains must make it clear that these are not rules or instructions for compulsory language use, but rather suggestions. And suggestions - such as this one with the locust comparison - can help to sharpen one's view of what one is actually saying when one uses such words, and what one wants to say, in a sensible discussion with pro and con arguments, in order to then decide for or against these terms. Anyone who reads the 89-page paper will come across such points several times.

Another example points to a mistake in science communication. Some people were provoked by Wehling's use of the term morality. with "Zeit" that she did not mean moralizing, but was referring to moral framing, i.e. a scientific concept.