The reason is the distribution

[Shishirgano9]

This package is far from unanimous, especially among press publishers . of revenue. Apple would take 50% of the revenue , which has caused more than one publisher to turn away from this new service . Some believe that this could open a massive breach in their paywall and therefore weaken an economic model that was starting to bear fruit. One thing is certain, it is certainly not designed to help the press . And who is ready to pay $120 per year to read magazines?

Moreover, the new video streaming service remains, even hungary cell phone number list after the keynote (our summary here ), still quite opaque . Despite a PR stunt attempted by Apple by calling on (aging) stars, Hollywood is still not convinced by the offer either . But that is not the issue. Especially since Apple TV+ does not even need to be profitable .

These announcements appear to be a symbol of a change of direction for the company. Apple wants to transform itself from a hardware supplier to an essential provider of (paid) services. As a bonus, they even provide the means of payment with …



Coincidence or not, YouTube has decided to throw in the towel on paid video streaming . Has competition from Netflix , Amazon , Disney and… Apple gotten the better of the platform?

For its part, Snapchat is creating more original programs for mobile , focusing more on premium content that is increasingly arriving on mobile .