Is artificial intelligence truly the bearer of creativity or is it merely a tool in the hands of the artist who wields it? The US Copyright Office has settled this controversial issue and declared that only works that are the result of human creation deserve to be anointed with copyright.
The lively debate surrounding artificial intelligence raises difficult questions for many bulgaria number data creative professionals. Who is the artist when AI is involved in the creative process? Can an image be subject to copyright when, even if it was generated by AI, it is based on a human idea?
Answering these and other questions is by no means easy and gives rise to a lengthy debate where it is difficult to find common ground. However, the United States Copyright Office has come forward to make it clear that, although artists are free to use AI to illuminate their works, these cannot in any way be protected by copyright. Copyright applies only and exclusively to works created 100% by real human beings.
The decision by the US Copyright Office specifically refers to Kristina Kashtanova's comic Zarya of the Dawn . The images in this work were generated with the help of Midjourney and the author obtained copyright protection a few months ago.
However, following the controversy sparked on social media over the copyright of Zarya of the Dawn, the United States Copyright Office decided to review its previous ruling and finally stripped the copyright from the comic images.
During the review process of the case, the US Copyright Office closely examined the process of creating the comic and also the role played by Midjourney in generating the images for the work. According to the experts of this institution, it is not enough for a human to take the trouble to select the different results produced by a software in order to benefit from the