To adapt to the new economy of the 21st century

[mahbubamim077]

The measure, therefore, has no revolutionary meaning and is inspired rather by the preservation of capitalism, which compromises in order to survive. Revolutionaries are not attracted to these partial transformations that dampen revolt and postpone the subversion of the social regime. Radical political thought is in favor of the expansion of orthodox, inflexible capitalism, which, according to its philosophy, carries within itself the elements of its own fatal self-destruction, which will then allow the end of all oppression. This is a refrain of the entire Marxist doctrine, which is translated into these words of LENIN, written in 1905 and recalled by ALBERT CAMUS in his book “L'homme revolté”:

“It is reactionary thinking to seek the salvation of the working cambodia bulk sms package class in anything other than the massive development of capitalism.”

Mere corrections or mitigations of abuses are palliatives: they cool the revolt, but maintain the organic injustice of the capitalist system. This is the line of revolutionary preaching. Its strength is fed by its radicalism: it is necessary to deny the proletariat everything so that it may one day have everything.

The economist views the problem from another angle; and it is quite natural that he should do so. Profit sharing was not considered a means of enriching the country, of increasing its wealth. It is a social policy measure, aimed at improving understanding between capital and labor. It is among the most advanced concessions that capitalism can make in order to achieve that objective.