The Federal Government’s decision to phase out coal and nuclear

[suchona.kani.z]

Looking at the CO2 equivalents alone reveals one of the greatest advantages of nuclear power plants. With emissions of just 12 g of CO2 equivalents per kWh, nuclear power plants have only a fraction of the CO2 emissions of coal-fired power plants and appear to be the optimal interim solution to achieve the agreed CO2 emission targets. However, nuclear power plants are designed to supply electricity evenly day and night, which makes them even less flexible than coal-fired power plants. The dismantling of the last three nuclear power plants is already planned for December 31, 2022, which is why no further fuel elements have been purchased.


As a result, the nuclear power plants still in operation would now have to reduce their output and use fewer of the remaining fuel elements in order to be able to provide energy for longer. This would allow nuclear energy to be used for longer, but the total amount of electricity would remain the same. The three remaining nuclear power plants are nepal consumer email list among the safest in the world, but they still require regular maintenance. The maintenance work was planned and scheduled well in advance and over several months based on the mandatory nuclear phase-out. An extension would require extensive, unscheduled maintenance. A special regulation is very questionable here, as the liability of the nuclear power plant operators also expires on January 1, 2023.


energy “in parallel” can be described as more than unfavourable, particularly from today’s perspective and taking into account current global political developments.

Even if, according to ARD-DeutschlandTrend, over 80 percent of those surveyed are in favor of short-term or even long-term use of nuclear energy, there are some parameters that must be taken into account that simply make this project more difficult under the current conditions. Be it the availability of raw materials or the unclear liability and the costly maintenance.

From this perspective, closing the supply gap through nuclear energy is associated with high hurdles of both a technical and licensing nature. Coal energy is therefore preferable from a feasibility perspective.

There is also an opportunity in the crisis: calls are becoming louder and louder for the energy crisis to be used to invest more in renewable energies instead of relying on fossil fuels again. The focus must be on faster expansion of wind and solar energy and the promotion of storage technology.

You can find more exciting topics from the adesso world in our previously published blog posts .